RUTLAND, VT — (Marketwire) — 03/13/09 –Source: Released: 03/13/09 04:59 AM EDT Central Vermont Public Service (NYSE: CV Central Vermont Public Service reported consolidated annual earnings of $16.4 million, or $1.52 per diluted share of common stock for 2008, compared to $15.8 million, or $1.49 per diluted share of common stock for 2007. CV reported fourth-quarter 2008 consolidated losses of less than $0.1 million, or 1 cent per diluted share of common stock, compared to earnings of $5.3 million, or 50 cents per diluted share of common stock, for the same period last year.Highlights: — Annual earnings of $16.4 million, or $1.52 per diluted share, up 3 cents compared to last year — Fourth-quarter loss of less than $0.1 million, or 1 cent per diluted share, 51 cents lower than last year — Increased annual resale revenues of $9.7 million and increased annual earnings from affiliates of $9.8 million contributed favorably — Retail rate increase of 2.3 percent effective Feb. 1, 2008 — Vermont Public Service Board (PSB) approved alternative regulation plan effective Nov. 1, 2008 — Deferred $4.1 million of Dec. 2008 ice storm costs for recovery over one-year beginning July 2009 — Common stock issuance of 1,190,000 shares provided $21.3 million of net proceeds — 2009 earnings guidance of $1.40 to $1.60 per diluted share.”Extremely high storm restoration costs due to a historic ice storm in December would have significantly affected our fourth-quarter and annual earnings, but we received a favorable Public Service Board regulatory decision, with the Department of Public Service’s endorsement, under our alternative regulation plan and were able to defer $4.1 million of those costs,” President Bob Young said. “Restoring service after the ice storm cost the company more than $5 million. Despite the tremendous costs and challenges, the storm showcased the incredible spirit and professionalism of our employees, who rose to the occasion and restored service to all customers quickly and safely. What could have been a disaster operationally became one of our finest hours.”Year-end 2008 results compared to 2007Annual operating revenues increased $13.1 million, including $9.7 million in resale revenues, $1.3 million in retail revenues and $2.1 million in other operating revenues. Resale revenues increased due to higher average prices and an increase in excess power available for resale. We had more power available for resale because retail sales volume decreased 2.6 percent, while output from Vermont Yankee, Independent Power Producers and our owned and jointly owned generating units increased compared to 2007.The increase in retail revenues included $5.7 million from the 2.3 percent rate increase and $2.2 million from higher average unit prices resulting from customer usage mix and rate redesign. This was partially offset by a $6.6 million decrease in sales volume. The volume decrease reflects lower average usage resulting from a slowing economy and energy conservation, and the effect of the loss of three industrial customers due to plant closures. Other operating revenues increased largely due to the sale of transmission rights.Purchased power expenses increased $4.7 million due to increased purchases of output from the Vermont Yankee plant, Independent Power Producers and short-term purchases, partially offset by reduced deliveries from Hydro-Quebec due to a 5 percent decrease in the annual load factor. Vermont Yankee operated at nearly full capacity during 2008 with the exception of a few derates and the scheduled refueling outage in the fourth quarter of 2008. The plant had a scheduled refueling outage in the second quarter of 2007, and a derate and unplanned outage in the third quarter of 2007.Other operating expenses increased $8.3 million. This was largely the result of higher transmission-related expenses, due to higher rates under the New England transmission tariff and costs from Vermont Transco LLC (“Transco”) for its capital projects and increases in its operating costs. As a result of a favorable regulatory decision from the Public Service Board, pursuant to our alternative regulation plan, we were able to defer $4.1 million of service restoration costs resulting from the ice storm in December 2008. We also had higher tree trimming and employee-related costs, higher net regulatory amortizations and reserves for uncollectible accounts, partially offset by lower professional service costs. In 2007, Other operating expenses included $3.5 million of service restoration costs related to the so-called Nor’icane.Other factors impacting 2008 results compared to 2007 include a $9.8 million increase in equity in earnings from affiliates as a result of the additional $53 million investment in Transco that we made in December 2007, partially offset by the related income taxes, a $2.3 million decrease in other, net, principally due to a decline in the cash surrender value of variable life insurance policies held in trust to fund supplemental retirement plans, which are affected by the equity markets, and a $3 million increase in interest expense largely due to the $60 million first mortgage bonds issued in May 2008.Fourth-quarter 2008 results compared to 2007Operating revenues decreased $3.2 million in the fourth quarter, including $3 million of lower resale revenues, $0.4 million of lower retail revenues, and $0.1 million of provision for rate refunds, offset by $0.3 million of higher other operating revenues. Resale revenues decreased due to less power available for resale due to planned nuclear refueling outages and lower average prices. Less power was available for resale due to the planned refueling outages at the Vermont Yankee and Millstone Unit #3 plants. Retail revenues decreased $0.4 million due to lower volume and customer usage mix, which were partially offset by the 2.3 percent retail rate increase effective Feb. 1, 2008.Purchased power expenses increased $0.5 million related to higher short-term purchases for replacement power during the planned nuclear plant outages and increased output from Independent Power Producers, partially offset by decreased output from the Vermont Yankee plant. Independent Power Producers consist primarily of hydro facilities and output levels are dependent on weather conditions.Other operating expenses increased $4.1 million due to transmission-related expenses principally due to higher rates under the tariff, partially offset by higher reimbursements under the New England open access transmission tariff. Other items are the same as those described above.Equity in earnings of affiliates increased $2.4 million, interest expense increased $0.8 million, and Other, net decreased $0.1 million due to the reasons described above.2009 Earnings GuidanceCV anticipates 2009 earnings in the range of $1.40 to $1.60 per diluted share. As part of an alternative regulation agreement approved by the Vermont Public Service Board, the company’s allowed rate of return on equity is 9.77 percent, but due to the earnings sharing provisions of the agreement, the actual return on equity from utility operations can fall between 10.21 percent and 8.77 percent.WebcastCV will host an earnings teleconference and webcast on March 13, 2009 beginning at 11 a.m. EDT. At that time, CV President and CEO Robert Young and CV Chief Financial Officer Pamela Keefe will discuss the company’s financial results, as well as progress made toward achieving its long-term strategy.Interested parties may listen to the conference call live on the Internet by selecting the “Q4 2008 Central Vermont Public Service Earnings Conference Call” link on the investor relations section of the company’s website at www.cvps.com(link is external). The dial-in number is: 1-877-407-0782. An audio archive of the call will be available at approximately 1 p.m. EDT at the same location or by dialing (Toll Free) 1-877-660-6853 or (International) 1-201-612-7415 and entering Passcodes: Account #: 286 and Conference ID #: 314464.About CVCV is Vermont’s largest electric utility, serving approximately 159,000 customers statewide. CV’s non-regulated subsidiary, Catamount Resources Corporation, sells and rents electric water heaters through a subsidiary, SmartEnergy Water Heating Services.Form 10-KToday the company filed its annual 2008 Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A copy of that report is available on the investor relations section of our web site, www.cvps.com(link is external). Please refer to it for additional information regarding our condensed consolidated financial statements, results of operations, capital resources and liquidity.Forward-Looking StatementsStatements contained in this press release that are not historical fact are forward-looking statements intended to qualify for the safe-harbors from the liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements made that are not historical facts are forward-looking and, accordingly, involve estimates, assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Actual results will depend, among other things, upon the actions of regulators, performance of the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant, effects of and changes in weather and economic conditions, volatility in wholesale electric markets and our ability to maintain our current credit ratings. These and other risk factors are detailed in CV’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings. CV cannot predict the outcome of any of these matters; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such indicated results will be realized. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date of this press release. CV does not undertake any obligation to publicly release any revision to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this press release.Reconciliation of Earnings Per Diluted Share Three Twelve Months Ended Months Ended December 31 December 312007 Earnings per diluted share $ 0.50 $ 1.49 (Lower) higher operating revenues (0.17) 0.73 Higher equity in earnings of affiliates 0.13 0.54 Higher purchased power expense (0.03) (0.27) Higher transmission expense (0.01) (0.25) Higher interest expense (0.05) (0.17) Higher other operating expenses (1) (0.21) (0.21) Other (2) (0.17) (0.34) ———– ———–2008 (Loss)/Earnings per diluted share $ (0.01) $ 1.52 =========== ===========(1) Includes higher tree trimming, employee-related and net regulatory amortizations, offset by lower service restoration costs, largely due to the April 2007 Nor’icane.(2) Includes higher loss on life insurance policies, affected by the equity markets, and higher income taxes related to equity in earnings. Central Vermont Public Service Corporation – Consolidated Earnings Release (unaudited) (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Three Months Ended Twelve Months Ended December 31 December 31 2008 2007 2008 2007 ———- ———- ———- ———-Condensed income statementOperating revenues: Retail sales $ 71,732 $ 72,083 $ 283,073 $ 281,819 Resale sales 8,211 11,254 48,641 38,935 Other 2,741 2,520 10,448 8,353 ———- ———- ———- ———-Total operating revenues 82,684 85,857 342,162 329,107 ———- ———- ———- ———-Operating expenses: Purchased power – affiliates and other 41,132 40,590 165,451 160,722 Other operating expenses 42,059 37,946 153,403 145,119 Income (benefit) tax expense (947) 1,443 4,878 5,291 ———- ———- ———- ———-Total operating expense 82,244 79,979 323,732 311,132 ———- ———- ———- ———-Utility operating income 440 5,878 18,430 17,975 ———- ———- ———- ———-Other income: Equity in earnings of affiliates 4,022 1,618 16,264 6,430 Other, net 13 92 (879) 1,379 Income tax expense (1,512) (183) (5,862) (1,458) ———- ———- ———- ———- Total other income 2,523 1,527 9,523 6,351 ———- ———- ———- ———-Interest expense 2,968 2,149 11,568 8,522 ———- ———- ———- ———-Net (loss) income (5) 5,256 16,385 15,804Dividends declared on preferred stock 92 92 368 368 ———- ———- ———- ———-Earnings available for common stock $ (97) $ 5,164 $ 16,017 $ 15,436 ========== ========== ========== ==========Per common share dataEarnings per share of common stock – basic $ (0.01) $ 0.51 $ 1.53 $ 1.52Earnings per share of common stock – diluted $ (0.01) $ 0.50 $ 1.52 $ 1.49Average shares of common stock outstanding – basic 10,863,926 10,222,378 10,458,220 10,185,930Average shares of common stock outstanding – diluted 10,863,926 10,380,808 10,536,131 10,350,191Dividends declared per share of common stock $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.92 $ 0.92Dividends paid per share of common stock $ 0.23 $ 0.23 $ 0.92 $ 0.92Supplemental financial statement dataBalance sheet Investments in affiliates $ 102,232 $ 93,452 Total assets $ 626,126 $ 540,314 Notes Payable $ 10,800 $ 63,800 Common stock equity $ 219,479 $ 188,807 Long-term debt (excluding current portions) $ 167,500 $ 112,950Cash Flows Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period $ 3,803 $ 2,799 Cash provided by operating activities 28,400 34,092 Cash used for investing activities (40,498) (76,620) Cash provided by financing activities 15,017 43,532 ———- ———- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 6,722 $ 3,803 ========== ==========
There were 737 new regular benefit claims for Unemployment Insurance last week, a decrease of 491 from the week before, as claims fell following a recent increase. Altogether 12,591 new and continuing claims were filed, a decrease of 230 from a week ago and 2,872 fewer than a year earlier. The Department also processed 2,044 First Tier claims for benefits under Emergency Unemployment Compensation, 2008 (EUC08), 45 fewer than a week ago. In addition, there were 989 Second Tier claims for benefits processed under the EUC08 program, which is an increase of 25 from the week before. The Unemployment Weekly Report can be found at: http://www.vtlmi.info/(link is external). Previously released Unemployment Weekly Reports and other UI reports can be found at: http://www.vtlmi.info/lmipub.htm#uc(link is external)
Sign up for our COVID-19 newsletter to stay up-to-date on the latest coronavirus news throughout New York A suspected hit-and-run driver was arrested for allegedly causing the death of a 59-year-old Seaford man in North Massapequa over the weekend, Nassau County police said.Francis Ossandon, 77, of Bethpage, was driving northbound on Hicksville Road when he struck a bicyclist and fled the scene at 6:26 p.m. Sunday, police said.The victim, Francis Llanos, was taken to Saint Joseph’s Hospital, where he was pronounced dead. Police found Ossandon at his residence and placed him under arrest.Ossandon was charged with leaving the scene of a fatality. He will be arraigned Monday at First District Court in Hempstead.
(NNPA)—Local and state governments are just like the federal government. They want to keep their largesse ways and not face the demand for austerity and good fiscal management. When times get tight they seek to get into your pockets via obscene taxation on any and everything they can find. There is no regard for the underserved or populations that can least afford damaging taxation for the sake of keeping massive governmental infrastructures. Many cities and counties are slipping taxes on cell phones like they are luxury items. The truth is cell phones are security items, family management tools and access to the Internet. Black citizens use cell phones as their number one vehicle to the Internet. So, when they start slapping taxes on your child’s phone and you are on a limited fixed income or assistance it becomes terribly damaging. They are doing this with reckless abandon and that is why we are pushing for a federal bill that will declare cell phones interstate commerce and prohibit any further local taxes for at least 10 years.Let’s say you purchase a download through the Internet. You live in Philadelphia and you buy it from a firm in Seattle, Washington. The server used in this transaction is located in St. Louis. What may happen is a triple tax on this transaction. You may pay Philadelphia, Pa. sales tax, Seattle, Wash. sales tax, and a St. Louis, Mo. sales tax all on one transaction. It is becoming crazy and somehow we must bring good management and governance in this new age of doing business.Now comes taxing grocery bags. Washington, D.C. started this under the last mayor. My wife and I no longer shop in D.C. We shop in Montgomery County, Md. However, the Montgomery County Council has just decided to implement their own five-cent grocery bag tax. Shall we now cross the Potomac River into Virginia? Better yet, let’s start getting a handle on this one.The stated goals of the tax are to raise revenue and curb the use of grocery bags. The bags, the county says, are an environmental hazard. Instead, county officials say they want to encourage Montgomery County shoppers to use reusable bags.Unfortunately, the measure misses the mark. What bag taxes like these result in isn’t very “green” at all. And, what might be affordable for one of America’s most affluent counties certainly wouldn’t be affordable for working class communities, let alone the entire state.Eliminating free grocery bags at the checkout means consumers must search for alternatives — presumably reusable plastic or cloth bags. Both options weigh more and take more energy to produce, contributing to greater emissions, not less.As alternatives, plastic reusables and cloth bags must be used repeatedly over time before their environmental impacts are less than that of plastic. If they aren’t reused to that extent, we only succeed in introducing more waste into our landfills. To illustrate, it would take 7.5 years of using the same cloth bag (393 uses, assuming one grocery trip per week) before it’s a better option than a plastic bag reused three times, like to carry lunch and then line a garbage can.And since so many people (nine out of 10 according to market surveys) reuse plastic grocery bags, without them, consumers would naturally replace plastic grocery bags with other, heavier gauge plastics, for household uses. After Ireland implemented its bag tax, consumption of purchased plastic trash bags increased by 400 percent. So, if the goal is to promote less waste in our landfills and use fewer plastics, bans and taxes don’t achieve those outcomes.Bag taxes also skirt the real issue of litter. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says plastic grocery bags make up less than 0.5 percent of the litter stream. Junk food wrappers, cigarette butts and paper, all make up bigger portions of litter, but plastic bags make for an easy target because they are visible, white, and often can get blown around. In effect, getting rid of plastic bags is negligible in cleaning up litter. Addressing litter requires more than just banning a product, it requires a change in habits, more recycling, and greater education.A tax on grocery bags is regressive. A growing number of Americans rely on government assistance for food, and taxes like this hurt these groups the most. In a time of rising gas prices, and with the rising cost of commodities driving up our grocery bills, the added financial burden at the check-out for a cause that has an arguable impact on improving the environment just doesn’t make sense.Though well-intended, a bag tax does more harm than help. Non-recyclable reusables are no better for the environment. The worst part is that the tax ends up hurting those that can least afford it. Fight this increased taxation effort whenever and wherever it comes up.(Harry Alford is the co-founder, president/CEO of the National Black Chamber of Commerce. Website: www.nationalbcc.org. Email: email@example.com.)